What effects do various pollutants have on groundwater? This question led researchers from both universities in Waterloo, the University of Guelph and Sir Sanford Fleming College on a journey of discovery and inspired the birth of test sites for the development of anti-pollution cleanup technology.
Five years ago the American Petroleum Institute
(API), the U.S. oil and gas industry's trade
association, started to seriously worry about a
potential environmental problem in North America's
increasingly biofuel-oriented future.
What was the ethanol, which depending on the mix
could make up anywhere from 15 to 85 per cent of
future biogasoline, going to do to groundwater if
there was a spill? The bad news was that nobody was
absolutely sure, and the good news was that API knew
exactly where it had to go to find out.
Borden, Ontario.
Why Borden?
There, researchers can contaminate and then
decontaminate wells drilled into the ground on the
site of a Canadian Forces base.
The significance of that, explains James Barker, a
professor of geochemistry and geology at the
University of Waterloo, is, "There are lots of good
people in the U.S. to do laboratory studies but not
many places allow you to actually contaminate
groundwater. In that regard, Borden is almost a
unique facility in the world, but," he quickly adds,
"of course, the contamination is done under the most
stringent controls and approvals."
Just as important, the facility is part of a group of
seven monitoring sites both in and outside the
province that Barker and fellow researchers at
Waterloo, the University of Guelph, Wilfrid Laurier
University and Sir Sanford Fleming College have
developed together to understand the effect of
various pollutants on groundwater.
The group's ethanol studies have revealed some
important findings that will be relevant in the real
world. It appears that one problem with ethanol is
that it may break down far too quickly and much too
readily for a water ecosystem's good.
"Ethanol is usually very easily biodegradable, so
theoretically it shouldn't be a problem in water,"
says Barker. "But because it's so easily broken down,
the bacteria which attacks things in the subsurface
would attack ethanol first."
He likens it to a person having a choice between
eating spinach and eating ice cream. The bacteria
immediately start consuming - that is, breaking down
- what tastes better to them - and that is ethanol.
"However, in breaking down, the bacteria uses up the
nutrients and oxygen which are required for them to
subsequently degrade benzene. Thus the remaining
benzene persists longer and travels further in
groundwater," he says. "So even if ethanol replaces
20 per cent of the benzene entering an ecosystem, the
benzene that you leave behind may be more of a
groundwater problem."
While it still remains to be determined how much of a
problem ethanol really is, API is grateful for the
new data.
"Things often seem to work differently when you are
trying to confirm them in a real-world system,"
points out Bruce Bauman, Soil/Groundwater Research
Program coordinator for API.
The counterintuitiveness of real-world
ethanol-testing results mirrors more general
counterintuitiveness in the project.
The original hypothesis, when the group organized the
testing sites, consisted of a one-way translation of
theory to application. "At the start," says Barker,
"our view was we have the ideas so let's just
commercialize them."
What they subsequently learned is that, on some
occasions, the sites were better used as incubators
for new technologies than as test beds of scientific
hypotheses.
"A field site designed and instrumented to evaluate
the migration of gasoline contaminants in groundwater
turned out to be much more useful as a place to
evaluate a variety of technologies to clean up such
contaminants. These technologies were not developed
from our research, but came from Canadian companies,"
says Barker.
This realization had led the facilities to expand
their mandates and become test sites for
anti-pollution technologies and approaches from
around the world.
"We've become a kind of Cape Canaveral for new
biological or technological approaches to cleaning up
polluted groundwater," explains Barker. "Companies
bring us their products, and we see if they will
fly."
And sometimes, they fly down a well.
